[MBZ] CA-spec '85 300D transmission?

[OK Don]

Makes sense to me - I'd think that they'd tilt the intermediate plate
- between the engine and the tranny - unless they did away with it in
the 60x engines.

On 6/2/06, Kaleb C. Striplin <kaleb at striplin.net> wrote:
> yep, thats the part Im not sure of.  But I am thinking that the 60x is
> slanted, but the bolt holes to mount the tranny wouldnt be at the same
> slant, they would have to be offset so the tranny would be mounted
> straight behind the engine.  So in other words, if you had a 60x and a
> 61x sitting rear end to rear end with the 60x sitting at its angle and
> the 61x sitting straight up, if you lined up the bolt holes at the back
> the ones on the 60x would line up with the other engine if you cocked
> the 60x at the proper angle it would normally be sitting in the car.
> Make sense?
>


-- 
OK Don, KD5NRO
Norman, OK
"The Americans will always do the right thing... after they've
exhausted all the alternatives."
Sir Winston Churchill
'90 300D, '87 300SDL, '81 240D, '78 450SLC, '97 Ply Grand Voyager